<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Making of a Billboard Model	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://yummy-wakame.com/weblog/2006/11/the-making-of-a-billboard-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://yummy-wakame.com/weblog/2006/11/the-making-of-a-billboard-model/</link>
	<description>UX Designer + Full-Stack Dev</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: olivia		</title>
		<link>https://yummy-wakame.com/weblog/2006/11/the-making-of-a-billboard-model/#comment-7546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olivia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yummy-wakame.com/archives/2006/11/17/3437#comment-7546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very interesting James and thanks for going into details. Personally I think the Dove models are very pretty - they just have normal womens figures that aren&#039;t currently considered all that fashionable. Hopefully that will change. I would love to see advertising like this used so widely that real women are considered normal again so our boyfriends don&#039;t secretly measure us against emaciated models and girls that look like boys anymore.

However I didn&#039;t know about the Lever FabergÃ© thing and I agree with you that they are definitely benefiting in both directions and its very unethical. Very clever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting James and thanks for going into details. Personally I think the Dove models are very pretty &#8211; they just have normal womens figures that aren&#8217;t currently considered all that fashionable. Hopefully that will change. I would love to see advertising like this used so widely that real women are considered normal again so our boyfriends don&#8217;t secretly measure us against emaciated models and girls that look like boys anymore.</p>
<p>However I didn&#8217;t know about the Lever FabergÃ© thing and I agree with you that they are definitely benefiting in both directions and its very unethical. Very clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://yummy-wakame.com/weblog/2006/11/the-making-of-a-billboard-model/#comment-7545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yummy-wakame.com/archives/2006/11/17/3437#comment-7545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think Dove are mean-spritied in that their campaign is *only* there to sell more Dove products.  The way they&#039;ve co-opted the issue of the appalling ways marketing (ab)uses people&#039;s self-esteem in order to sell products is vile.  Yes, the cosmetics industry is abusive but I&#039;m mighty suspicious at hearing that coming from a cosmetics company.

The concept of modelling with &#039;real women&#039; is also dubious.  It seems patronising or sneering: these people aren&#039;t conventionally beautiful, just like you, but that&#039;s OK with us.  In fact, say Dove, you mustn&#039;t opt out of being beautiful  just because you don&#039;t feel up to scratch.

Besides which Dove is owned by Lever Faberge.  They own conventional ranges that use models rather than &#039;real people&#039; as well as Lynx, which alone torpedoes any &#039;feminist&#039; credibility Dove could ever have.  Dove are simply segmenting the market so Lever Faberge can have their cake and eat it.

All of which is possibly a little ranty for a blog comment - no disrespect or discourtesy is intended!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Dove are mean-spritied in that their campaign is *only* there to sell more Dove products.  The way they&#8217;ve co-opted the issue of the appalling ways marketing (ab)uses people&#8217;s self-esteem in order to sell products is vile.  Yes, the cosmetics industry is abusive but I&#8217;m mighty suspicious at hearing that coming from a cosmetics company.</p>
<p>The concept of modelling with &#8216;real women&#8217; is also dubious.  It seems patronising or sneering: these people aren&#8217;t conventionally beautiful, just like you, but that&#8217;s OK with us.  In fact, say Dove, you mustn&#8217;t opt out of being beautiful  just because you don&#8217;t feel up to scratch.</p>
<p>Besides which Dove is owned by Lever Faberge.  They own conventional ranges that use models rather than &#8216;real people&#8217; as well as Lynx, which alone torpedoes any &#8216;feminist&#8217; credibility Dove could ever have.  Dove are simply segmenting the market so Lever Faberge can have their cake and eat it.</p>
<p>All of which is possibly a little ranty for a blog comment &#8211; no disrespect or discourtesy is intended!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: olivia		</title>
		<link>https://yummy-wakame.com/weblog/2006/11/the-making-of-a-billboard-model/#comment-7544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olivia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yummy-wakame.com/archives/2006/11/17/3437#comment-7544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know much about their promotion except what I&#039;ve seen. I like that they use models who look like real women we can all identify with. Their product makes your skin look more moisturised and healthy... it doesn&#039;t claim to make you look any more &quot;radiantly beautiful&quot; than the real women who model for them whereas other beauty products go to beauty extremes we can&#039;t ever reach.

I am fascinated though to know more about why you think their campaign is mean-spirited and where the double-standards come in if that is what you were trying to say. Please tell me more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much about their promotion except what I&#8217;ve seen. I like that they use models who look like real women we can all identify with. Their product makes your skin look more moisturised and healthy&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t claim to make you look any more &#8220;radiantly beautiful&#8221; than the real women who model for them whereas other beauty products go to beauty extremes we can&#8217;t ever reach.</p>
<p>I am fascinated though to know more about why you think their campaign is mean-spirited and where the double-standards come in if that is what you were trying to say. Please tell me more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://yummy-wakame.com/weblog/2006/11/the-making-of-a-billboard-model/#comment-7543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 06:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yummy-wakame.com/archives/2006/11/17/3437#comment-7543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hate the Dove &#039;self-esteem&#039; promotion.  I think it&#039;s as cynical and mean-spirited as the ideals it claims to oppose.  It&#039;s a genius piece of marketing but Dove are still selling &#039;beauty&#039; products.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the Dove &#8216;self-esteem&#8217; promotion.  I think it&#8217;s as cynical and mean-spirited as the ideals it claims to oppose.  It&#8217;s a genius piece of marketing but Dove are still selling &#8216;beauty&#8217; products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
